Cases 21 - 30 of 56
In re: Maria Martin
as 22-11351
Petitioner:
In re: MARIA NAVARRO MARTIN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Maria Martin
as 22-11353
Petitioner:
In re: MARIA NAVARRO MARTIN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Navarro Carrilo v. New York City Department of Ed
as 21-2639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria Navarro Carrilo and Jose Garzon
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Department of Education and Chancellor Richard Carranza
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Triminio v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC
as 8:2021cv01532
Defendant:
Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC
Plaintiff:
Maria Triminio and Maria Navarro
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory P. Holder
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Triminio v. Ceteris Portfolio Services, LLC,
as 8:2021cv01449
Defendant:
Ceteris Portfolio Services, LLC, and Ceteris Portfolio Services, LLC, doing business as SRA Associates
Plaintiff:
Maria Triminio and Maria Navarro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Arelis Araujo v. New York City Department of Ed
as 20-3993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Janice Torres, as Parents and Natural Guardians of A.L., Edwin Zayas, as Parents and Natural Guardians of RZ, Luis Nunez, Sr., as Parents and Natural Guardians of L.N. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Department of Education
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
