Cases 21 - 30 of 570
Andrews v. Tucker et al
as 3:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Byron Andrews
Defendant:
J.L. Tucker, Albertson, Mckennzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIZZELL v. KURTZMAN CARSON CONSTRUCTION et al
as 3:2022cv18638
Plaintiff:
JESSIE LEE BIZZELL
Defendant:
KURTZMAN CARSON CONSTRUCTION, RON DESANTIS and MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Inch et al
as 3:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Gary Bell
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Julie L. Jones, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
James L. Tolliver
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Asbelti Llorens Cordero, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Inch et al
as 3:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanders
Defendant:
Mark Inch, D.G. Davis, G. Emanoilidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2022cv06745
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, C MAIRANA, A MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH W ALLEN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK INCH, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. ROBBINS et al
as 3:2022cv04903
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ALESHIA ROBBINS, SHEILA MELVIN, K M KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. USA
as 22-40184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bonnie Burnette Erwin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Michael Horowitz, Jeff Baney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
