Cases 21 - 30 of 41
MCFADDEN v. PASSAIC COUNTY
as 2:2017cv11670
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY , ANTHONY J. DE NOVA, III , RICHARD A. ASHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
KENDELL SHAREEK MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDINA v. MCFADDENS AT BALLPARK, LLC
as 1:2017cv03312
Plaintiff:
AMELIA MEDINA and STEVE MEDINA
Defendant:
MCFADDENS AT BALLPARK, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC PARTNERSHIPS 11-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCFADDEN v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC et al
as 2:2017cv02332
Plaintiff:
KENDELL SHAREEK MCFADDEN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PASSAIC, PASSAIC COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, RICHARD H. BERDNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starks et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Farrah Starks , Tonya Hill , Joyce Sowles and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MCFADDEN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv08475
Plaintiff:
CARL MCFADDEN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOSEPH v. MCFADDEN et al
as 1:2016cv08054
Defendant:
JARED MCFADDEN, JOHN DOE and ABC CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LEONARD JOSEPH and BERNADETTE JOSEPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MCFADDEN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06855
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MCFADDEN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06376
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE MCFADDEN
Defendant:
COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06181
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MCFADDEN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. DM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01431
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
DM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. and DENISE MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
