Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Means v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv08049
Petitioner:
Clay Means
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Means v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv08045
Petitioner:
Clay Means
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tyler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
Sean Tyler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Corizon Medical Services, CMS and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01106
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes, Jimmy Patrick, Dothey Goode and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Baldwin County et al
as 1:2014cv00184
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Gardner, III
Defendant:
Baldwin County, Sheriff Mack, Officer Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Means v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2013cv00472
Petitioner:
Clay Means
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monroe v. Byrne et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Douglas Monroe
Defendant:
Major Byrne, Capt. Bennett, Sgt. Means and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Means v. State of Alabama
as 4:2012cv04049
Petitioner:
Schearean Jean Means
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacoby v. Baldwin County et al
as 1:2012cv00640
Plaintiff:
Brent Jacoby
Defendant:
Baldwin County, Sheriff Mack, Major Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. County of Baldwin et al
as 1:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Gardner, III
Defendant:
County of Baldwin, Sheriff Mack, Major Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
