Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Michael Thomas Wilson v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2013cv01409
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Wilson
Craig A Humphries, et al v. Los Angeles County, et al
as 8:2003cv00697
Defendant:
Charles T Ansberry, Charles T Ansberry, Leroy D Baca and others
Intervenor:
California Department of Social Services
Unknown:
Dep In Chg So Div and James V Selna
Plaintiff:
Craig Arthur Humphries and Wendy Dawn Aborn Humphries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. SAMSUNG SDI, CO., LTD. et al
as 3:2012cv06210
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Wilson
Defendant:
SAMSUNG SDI, CO., LTD., Samsung SDI America, Inc., LG Chem Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Michael Fitzgerald Wilson v. Linda T McGrew
as 2:2012cv05366
Respondent:
Linda T McGrew
Petitioner:
Michael Fitzgerald Wilson
Wilson v. Chavez et al
as 3:2011cv00599
Petitioner:
Michael David Wilson
Respondent:
Frank X Chavez and Kamalla Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Swarthout
as 3:2010cv04157
Petitioner:
Michael Howard Wilson
Respondent:
G. Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion et al v. Express Construction Services Inc et al
as 2:2008cv02072
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion, Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion, Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and others
Defendant:
Express Construction Services Inc, Don Adam Jimeno, Jack William Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michael K. Riley et al v. Alan Slater et al
as 8:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael K Riley and Michael D Wilson
Defendant:
Alan Slater, Michael S Carona, Theresa McAdam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
