Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Smith et al v. Pennock et al
as 4:2018cv04074
Plaintiff: Michael Smith, Joshua Warner, Gary Mayfield and others
Defendant: Wanda Pennock, Paula Lodge, Sharlene Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Pennock et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04072
Plaintiff: Michael Smith, Joshua Warner, Gary Mayfield and others
Defendant: Wanda Pennock, Paula Lodge, Sharlene Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Sears Holdings Corp.
as 1:2018cv01142
Plaintiff: Lisa Alberton and Michael Smith
Defendant: Sears Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rossmann v. African American and Other Lesbians, ect. et al
as 1:2017cv09347
Plaintiff: Brud Rossmann
Defendant: African American and Other Lesbians, ect., Barack Obama , Muriel Bowswer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. McCoy et al
as 1:2017cv01176
Plaintiff: Clarence Thomas
Defendant: Michael McCoy, Robert McCoy, Brian Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Walsh et al
as 3:2017cv03105
Plaintiff: Jared Michael Smith
Defendant: . Walsh, . Pfeiffer and Kess Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Roberson et al
as 3:2017cv03093
Plaintiff: Jared Michael Smith
Defendant: Kess Roberson, . Pfeiffer and . Dowdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Butler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00189
Plaintiff: Michael Smith
Defendant: Kimberly Butler, John Doe, C/O Macdonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Roberson
as 2:2017cv02009
Petitioner: Jared Michael Smith
Respondent: Kess Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitts et al v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv11498
Plaintiff: Herbert Pitts, Nathaniel Boyce, Coreyon Williamson and others
Defendant: Cook County Jail and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?