Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company et al
as 4:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Mary G.F. Jordan
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Jeffrey Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Buettner et al v. USA Gymnastics et al
as 4:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
Buettner, Mark Buettner, Bailey Buettner and others
Defendant:
USA Gymnastics, American Specialty Insurance & Risk Services, Inc. and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shindoll v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 4:2015cv00759
Plaintiff:
Martha Shindoll
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Mutual of Omaha Bank v. Mayer
as 4:2015cv01598
Plaintiff:
Mutual of Omaha Bank
Defendant:
William Johnson Mayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Badmus v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (MOOIC)
as 4:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
Abdul Salam Badmus
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (MOOIC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. Frost Bank et al
as 4:2014cv00771
Plaintiff:
Linda J Hart
Defendant:
Frost Bank, Bank of Texas, Mutual of Omaha Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Colin Suttles v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00752
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Colin Suttles
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Adams v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv04881
Plaintiff:
Lowell Adams
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernandez v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 4:2013cv03558
Plaintiff:
Mario Fernandez
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
