Cases 21 - 30 of 314
Kamatani Cloud LLC v. NEC Corporation of America
as 1:2020cv06721
Defendant:
NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Kamatani Cloud LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Terrestrial Comms LLC v. NEC Corporation
as 3:2020cv01620
Plaintiff:
Terrestrial Comms LLC
Defendant:
NEC Corporation of America and NEC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Longhorn HD LLC. v. NEC Corporation
as 2:2020cv00148
Plaintiff:
Longhorn HD LLC.
Defendant:
NEC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Terrestrial Comms LLC v. NEC Corporation
as 6:2020cv00096
Plaintiff:
Terrestrial Comms LLC
Defendant:
NEC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Neptune Subsea IP Limited v. NEC Corporation
as 20-1386
Appellee:
NEC CORPORATION, ALCATEL SUBMARINE NETWORKS and NOKIA CORPORATION
Appellant:
NEPTUNE SUBSEA IP LIMITED
Far North Patents, LLC v. Broadcom Pte. Ltd. et al
as 4:2019cv00939
Defendant:
CA Inc., Broadcom Pte. Ltd., Broadcom Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Far North Patents, LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V., Marvell Technology Group Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Far North Patents, LLC v. NEC Corporation
as 4:2019cv00943
Defendant:
NEC Corporation
Plaintiff:
Far North Patents, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Roman v. Nighthawk Security Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06935
Defendant:
NEC Corporation of America, Daniel J Murphy and Nighthawk Security Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edwin Roman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roman v. Nighthawk Security Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11050
Defendant:
NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Daniel J. Murphy and NIGHTHAWK SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC.
Plaintiff:
Edwin Roman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Terrestrial Comms LLC v. NEC Corporation
as 6:2019cv00597
Plaintiff:
Terrestrial Comms LLC
Defendant:
NEC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
