Cases 21 - 30 of 307
Hicks v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 6:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Norris Hicks
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AAKIL Holdings Trust et al v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions Inc
as 4:2022cv01258
Plaintiff:
AAKIL Holdings Trust, Norris Groves and Raymond Groves
Defendant:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Norris
as 4:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Olivia A. Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar
as 3:2021cv00309
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi and Peter Lee Norris
Respondent:
Warden Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norris v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Peter Lee Norris and Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar
as 3:2021cv00291
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi and Peter Lee Norris
Respondent:
Warden Hijar and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norris v. Ms. Hjar et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Peter Lee Norris and Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
Ms. Hjar and Director, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris et al v. United States Precious Metals, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Vincenta Norris and Charles D Norris
Defendant:
United States Precious Metals, LLC, Spindletop Coins, Inc. and Nathan Camp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Norris v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00601
Plaintiff:
Waynette Norris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
