Cases 21 - 28 of 28
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. SHAMS QURESHI, M.D., et al
as 2:2013cv05850
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SHAMS QURESHI, M.D., MICHAEL DOBROW, D.O., TAI PAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peter Chun Nam Yeung v. Linda Sanders
as 1:2011cv05966
Petitioner:
PETER CHUN NAM YEUNG
Respondent:
LINDA SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CUI et al v. YOU CHUN PALISADES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv05243
Plaintiff:
MEIYU CUI , JISHUN JIANG and SEGUNDO TAMAY
Defendant:
YOU CHUN PALISADES CORPORATION and NAM JE PARK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS v. KAPLI INC. et al
as 3:2011cv03461
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Defendant:
KAPLI INC. and KWANG WOO NAM
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00041
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
FINANCE ONE, INC. v. LEE et al
as 2:2009cv01962
Plaintiff:
FINANCE ONE, INC.
Defendant:
YANG JO LEE and NAM YOUNG CHUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PARKLANE, INC. et al v. KIM
as 2:2007cv06066
Plaintiff:
PARKLANE, INC., KWONG HO KEH, WAN HUI NAM and others
Defendant:
SUNG HO KIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
REGENCY PARK RESIDENT'S ASSOCIATION et al v. REGENCY HOUSING PARTNERS, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv02465
Plaintiff:
REGENCY PARK RESIDENT'S ASSOCIATION, LISA MARIE MORRIS, LUVENIA CALLUM and others
Defendant:
REGENCY HOUSING PARTNERS, L.P., JOHN A. JENNINGS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
