Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nicholes v. Advanced Credit Management
as 2:2010mc01045
Plaintiff:
Carrie J. Nicholes
Defendant:
Advanced Credit Management
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Nicholes v. Advanced Credit Management
as 2:2010mc01046
Plaintiff:
Carrie J. Nicholes
Defendant:
Advanced Credit Management
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Pennington et al v. Salt Lake County et al
as 2:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
Garry Pennington , Judy Pennington and Tyler Pennington
Defendant:
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Lohra L. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TFG-North Carolina v. Good Life-Land, The et al
as 2:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
TFG-North Carolina
Defendant:
Good Life-Land, The, Outstanding Enterprises, Edwin W. Bice, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Nicholls v. Bigelow
as 2:2009cv00982
Petitioner:
Craig Duncan Nicholls
Respondent:
Alfred Bigelow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Patterson et al
as 2:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Max Barnes, Jr
Defendant:
Thomas E. Patterson, Steven Turley, Bruce Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nichols v. State of Utah
as 2:2008cv00123
Petitioner:
Richard A. Nichols
Respondent:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Baer et al
as 2:2008cv00089
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Nichols
Defendant:
Mark Baer, Bryce Greer and Colin Winchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
