Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Shale Royalties 21, Inc. et al
as 3:2009mc00456
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Receiver:
Dennis L. Roossien
Defendant:
Shale Royalties 21, Inc., Shale Royalties 22, Inc., Provident Operating Company, LLC and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PROVIDENT ROYALTIES, LLC et al
as 2:2009mc00327
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
PROVIDENT ROYALTIES, LLC, PROVIDENT ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, PROVIDENT ENERGY 1, LP and others
Receiver:
DENNIS L. ROOSSIEN, JR.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PROVIDENT ROYALTIES, LLC et al
as 2:2009mc00215
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
PROVIDENT ROYALTIES, LLC, PROVIDENT ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, PROVIDENT ENERGY 1, LP and others
Cause Of Action: copy of Order from Another District Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WELH v. MANFREDI TRANSPORTATION, CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02873
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH WELH
Defendant:
MANFREDI TRANSPORTATION, CO., INC., CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MATTHEWS et al v. RYOU et al
as 2:2007cv05207
Plaintiff:
BONNIE MATTHEWS and HARRY MATTHEWS
Defendant:
YOUNG OK RYOU and HOYOUN RYOU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
THOMPSON v. RYOU et al
as 2:2007cv04802
Plaintiff:
VICKY THOMPSON
Defendant:
YOUNG OK RYOU and HO YOUN RYOU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
