Cases 21 - 30 of 472
CLAYTON v. KEMP et al
as 5:2024cv00367
Defendant:
BRIAN P KEMP, JEREMY FOSTER, HATCHER and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Defendant:
DR KATHLEEN E TOOMEY, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, DR MARK WOODS and others
Plaintiff:
MARIO R SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 2:2024cv00236
Defendant:
Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Avetta Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
LOGAN v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00352
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DESEAN LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blocker v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv04547
Plaintiff:
Antonio Blocker
Defendant:
GDC Commisioner Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv04476
Petitioner:
Timothy LaBron Woodard
Respondent:
Commissioner Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Couch, Calpwell, McGaee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. OLIVER et al
as 7:2024cv00097
Defendant:
WARDEN RALPH SHROPSHIRE, WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND DUNN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFREY FARMER, ASST COMMISSIONER RANDY SAULS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capehart v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Gillis, Dr. Neav, J. Randall Sauls and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Capehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
