Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Talon Wall Holdings, LLC et al v. Reflection Window & Wall, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06618
Plaintiff:
Talon Wall Holdings, LLC, Entekk Group LTD. and Chicago Heights Glass, Inc.
Defendant:
Reflection Window & Wall, LLC, Joel J. Phelps, Pepper Construction Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Abuharba v Claycomb et al
as 3:2021cv01077
Plaintiff:
Monammed Abuharba
Defendant:
Chaplain Claycomb, Chief Keim, Lance Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. 005 District Police et al
as 1:2021cv03448
Defendant:
Dela Huerta, T Pringles and 005 District Police
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01243
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
ssa ogc and SSAOGC
Plaintiff:
Tammy Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Phelps et al
as 3:2020cv00980
Defendant:
Sylvia E. Phelps, Kevin M. Phelps and City of Murphysboro, Illinois
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Battle v. Illinois River Correctional Center et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
S Naber, Illinois River Correctional Center, . Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Hammers et al
as 1:2020cv01137
Defendant:
Shelia Batton, . Rilea, Steven Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Hammers et al
as 1:2019cv01400
Defendant:
Matthew W Curtis, Andy D Phelps and Justin Hammers
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dennison et al
as 3:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Chad Hillard, Warden Walker, C. Kwiatkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
