Cases 21 - 30 of 39
RODRIGUEZ v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv04862
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, BRIAN REYNOLDS, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KINEE v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv04586
Plaintiff:
SHERRIANNE KINEE
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. SPICER et al
as 2:2014cv03263
Plaintiff:
TYRONE FOSTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS, CHARLES KAPUSNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv01751
Plaintiff:
AARON HUNTER
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, BRIAN REYNOLDS, CHARLES KAPUSNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONROE v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv01752
Plaintiff:
CARL MONROE
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIROLLO v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv01365
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PIROLLO
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, BRIAN REYNOLDS, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIRANDA v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv00854
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MIRANDA
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, THOMAS KUHN, MICHAEL SPEISER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYES v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2013cv06916
Plaintiff:
RAUL REYES
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY, KEVIN BETHEL, WILLIAM V. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESHIELDS v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2013cv06814
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE DESHIELDS
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JOSEPH McCLOSKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AUGUSTINE et al v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2013cv06606
Plaintiff:
NOEL AUGUSTINE , MICHAEL BARANKOVICH , MOSHE BITTERMAN and others
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY, KEVIN BETHEL, WILLIAM V. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
