Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Hill v. Harvey et al
as 2:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Michael Maxwell Hill, King Michael Tutankhaman and Grand Royal Prince Michael Dompledore, III
Defendant:
Markus Harvey, Marcos Harvey, Cameron Rye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Altheide v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv02223
Plaintiff:
Jason Altheide
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Sonya Carrillo, Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01254
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prince v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2021cv01196
Plaintiff:
Danielle Prince
Defendant:
United States of America, Nataly Alvarez, United States of America ex rel and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Prince Cafe Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01563
Defendant:
Prince Cafe Restaurant, Inc., Nebojsa Krkeljas, Sinisa Krkeljas and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nunn III v. Goldstein et al
as 2:2019cv01543
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan PD, State of Nevada, Prince Alidu and others
Plaintiff:
Sammie Nunn III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colosimo et al v. Prince Telecom, LLC
as 2:2019cv00647
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A Porteous and Steven M Colosimo
Defendant:
Prince Telecom, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carmona v. Prince et al
as 2:2018cv01694
Plaintiff:
Job Abraham Carmona
Defendant:
Trans-West Logistics, Inc. and Gilles Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Century Surety Company v. Prince et al
as 2:2016cv02465
Plaintiff:
Century Surety Company
Defendant:
Sylvia Esparza, Dennis Prince and George Ranalli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Prince v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv00502
Defendant:
Oregon Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
