Cases 21 - 27 of 27
v. River Terrace, L.P. et al
as 2:2011at01654
Defendant:
River Terrace, L.P. and Peter P. Bollinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Peter P. Fay, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al.
as 8:2011cv01117
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Beverly A Fay and Peter P Fay
P et al v. Roseville Joint Union High School District
as 2:2010cv03129
Plaintiff:
H P, Megan P and Peter P
Defendant:
Roseville Joint Union High School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
People of the State, et al v. M&P Investments, et al
as 2:2000cv02441
Amicu:
- People of the State of California , Department of Toxic Substances Control and State Water Resources Control Board of the State of California
Plaintiff:
City of Lodi
Cross_defendant:
City of Lodi, Busy Bee Laundry and Cleaning, Angelina Comporato and others
Counter_claimant:
Odd Fellows Hall Association of Lodi, Ackel Investment Co , William Ackel and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Lustre-Cal Nameplate Corp , Ackel Investment Co , William Ackel and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
James J Babcock , James Babcock , Ackel Investment Co and others
Cross_claimant:
Ackel Investment Co , William Ackel , Charles Ackel and others
Counter_defendant:
Ackel Investment Co , William Ackel , Charles Ackel and others
Defendant:
American Stores Properties Inc , Lodi Dodge Chrysler Plymouth Inc, Lucky Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
