Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Shahroki v. Harter et al
as 2:2021cv01126
Defendant:
Marzola and Ruiz Law Group, Philip Spradling, Mathew Harter and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahroki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02230
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation doing business as Hello Neighbor Smoke Shop, Terrible Herbst, Inc. doing business as Terrible Herbst #229, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. doing business as Chevron Station #377379 and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Price v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00609
Defendant:
Judge Jennifer Magos, Reno, City of, Nicholas Zicari and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Conestoga Settlement Services, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01716
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Jackson, Deatra Lane, Eberle Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Conestoga Settlement Services, LLC, Conestoga International, LLC, Conestoga Trust Services, LLC and others
Shahrokhi v. Harter, et al.
as 2:2020cv01623
Defendant:
Judge Matthew Harter, Philip Spradling, Thomas Standish and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahrokhi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosz v. USA
as 2:2020cv01089
Petitioner:
Jonathan Philip Mosz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bouchard v. National Casualty Company et al
as 2:2020cv01084
Defendant:
Coast National Insurance Company dba Foremost Insurance Group, National Casualty Company, Selman Breitman LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Bouchard Philip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graham v. Schlager et al
as 3:2020cv00078
Defendant:
M. Naughton, Philip S. Schlager, Michael Minev and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 2:2019cv01495
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Clark and Yvonne Clark
Defendant:
Liggett Group, LLC, Philip Morris USA, Inc., RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
