Cases 21 - 30 of 145
PUGH v. SEVAAETASI et al
as 3:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J PUGH
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN SEVAAETASI, JONATHAN CRAMER and HOME DEPOT INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUGH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25283
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TREY PUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHESTNUT v. ROSE et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Defendant:
Amy Rose, JAMES CARTER, LUIS RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
GERNARD D CHESTNUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv22213
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FLORES
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHAD PUGH, TYLER FENDLASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUGH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20962
Plaintiff:
RYAN WARREN PUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PUGH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20819
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN MICHAEL PUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pugh et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC; et al
as 9:2022cv81402
Plaintiff:
Jerry Pugh and Estate of Pamela McMahan
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC;, Pfizer Inc and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PUGH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11437
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LLOYD PUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEAL v. PUGH et al
as 3:2022cv10062
Plaintiff:
MARCUS RAMONE DEAL
Defendant:
G PUGH, C NICHOLAS, R PRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh et al v. Palm Haven Towers Condominium, Inc.
as 0:2022cv60824
Plaintiff:
Heath C Pugh, Amanda G Pugh, Heath Carlton Pugh and others
Defendant:
Palm Haven Towers Condominium Inc and Palm Haven Towers Condominium, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
