Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROLLINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10047
Plaintiff:
MARY ROLLINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNichols et al v. Johnson & Johnson,Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05719
Plaintiff:
Donna McNichols , Tonya Armitage , Joni Barnhart and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROLLINS et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06567
Plaintiff:
ALLAN ROLLINS and YVONNE ROLLINS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RODDY v. ROLLINS
as 1:2013cv01376
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS JOSEPH RODDY
Defendant:
PAT ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
ROLLINES v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2012cv03181
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, ROBERT DAMMINGER and others
Petitioner:
KENDALL ROLLINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH et al v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2011cv06192
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WELCH, SAADIQ ROBINSON, AARON COOK and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, ROBERT DAMMINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLINS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ROLLINS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
