Cases 21 - 30 of 787
Garcia et al v. Ramos et al
as 5:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Edgar Garcia, Eric Garcia and April Garcia
Defendant:
Oscar Ramos, Bryan Patten, Juan Carlos-Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 4:2023cv04580
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Ramos
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Diaz v. Enlish Cantu et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Enriqueta Diaz
Defendant:
Ramsey Enlish Cantu, Roxanna Rios, Olga Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramos v. Reckon Transportation, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gutierrez Ramos
Defendant:
Reckon Transportation, LLC and Jorge Pozos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Rene Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
