Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Rose v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2013cv00104
Petitioner:
Colin Rose
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and D. Ray James Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2013cv00080
Petitioner:
Vaughn Johnson
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and D. Ray James Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bandjan et al v. Johns et al
as 5:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Bandjan and D. Ray James Corrections Muslim Inmates
Defendant:
Johns, Dye, Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivas Zamudio v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
Carlos Manuel Olivas Zamudio
Defendant:
D. Ray James Correctional Facility, Charles Harden, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juarez-Rebollar v. Stein et al
as 2:2012mc00006
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Juarez-Rebollar
Defendant:
Mr. Stein and Medical Department D. Ray James F.C.
Maldonado v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Carlos Maldonado Aguilar
Defendant:
D. Ray James Correctional Facility and GEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lizama v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Frank Lebito Lizama
Defendant:
United States Of America, D. Ray James Institution, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Owens et al
as 5:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Renard Brown
Defendant:
Owens, Woods, Mcelroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Owens et al
as 6:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Renard Brown
Defendant:
Owens, Woods, Mcelroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. D. Ray James Detention Center
as 5:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Emanual Jones
Defendant:
D. Ray James Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
