Cases 21 - 30 of 30
BROWN v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv00547
Defendant:
JEREMY A BROWN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, KIM WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01744
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, CONSTANCE REESE and DELBERT SAVERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv01663
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEMITRI BROWN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, LAPPIN, R. S. BALLASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIQUEZ v. REESE et al
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
JUAN RODRIQUEZ
Defendant:
CONSTANCE REESE, NAME UNKNOWN and HARELY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCAFF-MARTINEZ v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00267
Petitioner:
GABRIEL SCAFF-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN and CONSTANCE REESE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
LANDINGHAM v. HARLEY LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv00833
Plaintiff:
JAMES CLAYTON LANDINGHAM
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, BRUCE PEARSON, CONSTANCE REESE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BANKS v. BRATCHER et al
as 1:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
BRATCHER, WRIGHT, MUCUTCHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REESE v. BAHASH
as 1:2007cv01530
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE A. REESE
Defendant:
ROBERT J. BAHASH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
ROBINSON v. REESE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES, INC.
as 1:2007cv00904
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
REESE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
