Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Whitnable v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Tamala Renae Whitnable
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riggs v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rena Riggs
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins v. Conn et al
as 2:2014cv01365
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Watkins
Defendant:
Sue Rena Conn, Deborah Lockridge Hunt, Frank Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFarland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01082
Plaintiff:
Sharla Rena McFarland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beauford et al v. Actionlink, LLC
as 5:2014mc00004
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Beauford, David Caffey, Steve Cox and others
Defendant:
Actionlink, LLC
Dewey-Morrison v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21221
Plaintiff:
Rena Dewey-Morrison
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Napier v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2013cv00644
Plaintiff:
Erica Rena Napier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bump Babies, Inc. et al v. Baby the Bump, Inc. et al
as 5:2012mc00113
Plaintiff:
Bump Babies, Inc., Fund Babeez, LLC and Renae Plant
Defendant:
Baby the Bump, Inc., Apple and Eve Maternity, LLC and Velva Lyn Stricker
Castillo et al v. Morales, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00650
Plaintiff:
Renae Castillo and Rhonda Sanchez
Defendant:
Morales, Inc. and John Doe I - II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Woody et al v. Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp23059
Plaintiff:
Rena Mae Woody and James Scott Woody
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
