Cases 21 - 30 of 30
RAOOF et al v. TILLERSON et al
as 1:2017cv01156
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA RAOOF , SIDRA HAYE and M. R.
Defendant:
REX W. TILLERSON, MARCIA PRYCE, JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
LU v. TILLERSON
as 1:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
YUNG-KAI LU
Defendant:
REX W. TILLERSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
O'DIAH v. CORDRAY et al
as 1:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
RICHARD CORDRAY, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
UNIVERSAL MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv00537
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. , JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE et al
as 1:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, MICHAEL DEMPSEY, WILLIAM EVANINA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
FARRELL v. TILLERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
GERALD LEE FARRELL
Defendant:
REX W. TILLERSON, CORRIN FERBER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
GOMEZ v. KELLY et al
as 1:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
ISAAC D. NARVAEZ GOMEZ
Defendant:
JEDIDAH M. HUSSEY , JAMES COMEY , REX W. TILLERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1631
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
