Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Martinez v. Wathen et al
as 7:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, Jonathan R Eaststep, David R Skelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyer v. Potter et al
as 7:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sawyer
Defendant:
David Potter, Richard E Wathen and Tommy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)
as 7:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nedro Gwen Parker and Frederick Deone Gooden
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James D Anders, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Banargent v. Richard Wathen, et al
as 12-10438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BANARGENT
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD E WATHEN, Warden and TINA VITOLO
Redic v. Steele et al
as 7:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
Timothy Anthony Redic
Defendant:
Jennifer N Steele, Richard E Wathen and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banargent v. Wathen et al
as 7:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Banargent
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen and Tina Vitolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Wathen et al
as 7:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Garcia
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James E Anders, Charles J Vandra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Taylor v. Nathaniel Quarterman, et al
as 11-10680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY DESHAN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL A. QUARTERMAN, Director, RICHARD E WATHEN, Warden, KRISTI M. PICKETT, Senior LVN Nurse and others
Roy Taylor v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director, et al
as 11-10651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY DESHAN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL A. QUARTERMAN, Director, EDDIE HERNANDEZ, CO4, JASON KIRKLAND, CO5 and others
Martin Vinson v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 11-40469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN E. VINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, BILLY HIRSCH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
