Cases 21 - 30 of 206
ZINK v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
KENNETH M ZINK
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICKY D DIXON, CONSUELA ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
ELBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROSBY v. DIXON
as 3:2023cv24759
Petitioner:
TAIKWAN KEMAN CROSBY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWMAN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
DUSTY L BOWMAN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, MR RICHARD COMERFORD, GARY HEWETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HODGE v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24738
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT HODGE
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, K WATKINS, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
DAVID R MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WADE v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00508
Petitioner:
RANDY J WADE
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noel Nino v. Michael Sanjurjo, et al
as 23-13844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOEL NORBERTO NINO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SANJURJO, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Official Capacity, RICKY D. DIXON and others
Willis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Seminole County)
as 5:2023cv00683
Petitioner:
Lil Burtie Willis
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reginal Paulk, Sr. v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 23-13750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINAL ANDREW PAULK, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKY D. DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, ABIA IMESIT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
