Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Freaner v. Lutteroth Valle et al
as 3:2011cv01819
Plaintiff:
Ariel Freaner
Defendant:
Enrique Martin Lutteroth Valle and Hotelera Coral, S.A. de C.V.
Counter_claimant:
Hotelera Coral, S.A. de C.V.
Counter_defendant:
Ariel Freaner , Neyensech Printers, Inc. and ROES 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 7:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Contemporary Services Corporation et al v. Lori Jo Hartman et al
as 2:2008cv02967
Plaintiff:
Contemporary Services Corporation, Protatech, Inc. and Cultural Protection Property Group
Defendant:
Lori Jo Hartman and DOES 1 TO 20, inclusive
Counter Defendant:
Roes 1 to 20 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMC Networks v. Lantech Advance Corporation et al
as 8:2007cv00774
Plaintiff:
SMC Networks, SMC Networks and SMC Networks
Defendant:
Lantech Advance Corporation, Lantech Advance Corporation and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Counter Claimant:
Netstar Technology Corporation, Netstar Technology Corporation and Roes 1 through 20
Counter Defendant:
Roes 1 through 20 and SMC Networks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
