Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Romero v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv00938
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Juan Romero
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Paulson
as 6:2014cv00595
Defendant:
Dr. Reed Paulson
Plaintiff:
Danny Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01507
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Romero v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00631
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alvarez et al v. Charter Construction Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00494
Plaintiff:
Jairo Elias Alvarez, Luis Andrade-Romero, Manuel Bautista and others
Defendant:
Charter Construction Inc., Manny G. Construction Inc., Old Star Construction Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Romero v. Vargo et al
as 6:2012cv01993
Defendant:
Carrie Coffee, Dr. Hansen, Steve Shelton, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero-Duarte v. USA
as 3:2012cv01375
Petitioner:
Rafael Romero-Duarte
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Romero v. Persson
as 6:2011cv01563
Respondent:
Rob Persson
Petitioner:
Daniel Luna Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
