Cases 21 - 30 of 334
Banks v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Mr. Fillepip, Mrs. Michelle Jackson, Officer McKinnel and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Banks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00406
Plaintiff:
Stafford L. Chambers and Stafford L. Monroe
Defendant:
Mr. Unknown Philiot, James Millers, Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00368
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Wendell Banks, Officer Unknown Long, Officer Unknown Lonnie and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. King
as 5:2020cv00139
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Wilson and Winding
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. King et al
as 1:2020cv00105
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Sup. Ronald King
Petitioner:
Johnny Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eacholes v. Taylor et al
as 3:2020cv00243
Defendant:
Ronald King, Tommy Taylor and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Deairis Simone Eacholes
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillie v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, Sheriff Kelvin Williams and Ronald King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00235
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen McCoy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Love v. Dyer et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Gains S. Dyer, Lynn Fitch and Ronald King
Plaintiff:
William Wade Love
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. King
as 3:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Ronald King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Joseph Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
