Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Lewis v. Arnold et al
as 3:2015cv01476
Plaintiff:
William L. Lewis
Defendant:
Robert Arnold, Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and Rutherford County Deputies and Jail Admin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritter v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Ritter
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
George Simpson
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamendola v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2014cv02180
Plaintiff:
John Lamendola
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2014cv01247
Plaintiff:
Charles E. May
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Boggs
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Arnold et al
as 3:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Carter
Defendant:
Robert Arnold, f/n/u Gaither, f/n/u Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Arnold et al
as 3:2012cv01213
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Brown
Defendant:
Robert Arnold and Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2012cv00914
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and f/n/u Minter
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Moore, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Edward Keith Lee
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center, Rutherford County and David Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
