Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. Satco Products, Inc.
as 2:2019cv04951
Plaintiff:
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. and Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. et al v. Satco Products, Inc.
as 1:2019cv21507
Plaintiff:
SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. and Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Satco Products, Inc. v. Lighting Science Group Corp.
as 19-1638
Appellee:
LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
Appellant:
SATCO PRODUCTS, INC.
Satco Products, Inc. v. Lighting Science Group Corp.
as 19-1639
Appellee:
LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
Appellant:
SATCO PRODUCTS, INC.
PHILIPS LIGHTING NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION et al v. FEIT ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018mc00018
Respondent:
FEIT ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., FEIT ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. (CHINA), LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Application for Letters Rogatory
Imperial Motors v. Satco Products, Inc
as 1:2017cv09049
Plaintiff:
Imperial Motors
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ETi Solid State Lighting, Inc v. Satco Products, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02403
Plaintiff:
ETi Solid State Lighting, Inc.
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blackbird Tech LLC v. Satco Products, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
Blackbird Tech LLC
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lighting Science Group Corporation v. Satco Products, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01256
Plaintiff:
Lighting Science Group Corporation
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
