Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Wallace v. Scampone et al
as 1:2012cv01974
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Wallace
Defendant:
Lieutenant C. Scampone, Lieutenant Miller, W. Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richardson v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv02266
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Richardson
Defendant:
Bryan A Bledsoe, Thomas R. Kane, Joseph Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Hurst v. Snider et al
as 3:2011cv02122
Plaintiff:
Scottie R. Hurst
Defendant:
S Snider, Hunter, Scampone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ari Bailey v. Stephen Forostiak, et al
as 11-8093
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Respondent:
STEPHEN FOROSTIAK, Asbestos Coor. E.P.A., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, BOP Dir., CONNELLY, Asst. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Hill v. Scampone et al
as 3:2011cv01553
Plaintiff:
David E. Hill
Defendant:
Scampone, Tharp, Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ari Bailey v. Forostiak, et al
as 11-8030
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Respondent:
DELBERT G. SAUERS, Chief D.S.C.C. Grand Praine, TX, T. L. NORWOOD, Reg Dir., CONNELLY, Assist. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Ari Bailey v. Forostiak, et al
as 11-2193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DELBERT G. SAUERS, Chief D.S.C.C. Grand Praine, TX, T. L. NORWOOD, Reg Dir., CONNELLY, Assist. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Bailey v. Forostiak et al
as 3:2011cv00577
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Stephen Forostiak, Harley G. Lappin, Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Connelly, Delbert G. Sauers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shelton v. Bledsoe et al
as 4:2011cv00368
Plaintiff:
Norman N Shelton
Defendant:
Warden Bledsoe, A. W. Young, Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
