Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Bausch & Lomb v. Reyes
as 2:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
Bausch & Lomb
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes
Movant:
1-800 Contacts and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Needham v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Aaron David Trent Needham
Defendant:
State of Utah, Mark L. Shurtleff, John Swallow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. v. Reyes
as 2:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Vision Care and Bausch & Lomb
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes
Intervenor_plaintiff:
1-800 Contacts and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collett v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00871
Plaintiff:
Nathan Samuel Collett
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Hackford v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00872
Plaintiff:
Richard Dewray Hackford
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Hackford et al v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Richita Hackford and Opal Hackford
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640
Hackford v. The State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00645
Plaintiff:
Richard Douglas Hackford
Defendant:
The State of Utah, Wasatch County, Gary Herbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Abdo et al v. Reyes et al
as 2:2014cv00620
Plaintiff:
Michael Abdo and Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes , Tooele County , J. Bruce Clegg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gunter v. Pulsipher et al
as 2:2014cv00574
Petitioner:
David Gunter
Respondent:
Cory Pulsipher and Sean D. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Digital Recognition Network et al v. Herbert et al
as 2:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Digital Recognition Network and Vigilant Solutions
Defendant:
Gary Herbert and Sean D. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
