Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 249
Wali Morafa, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5225
Petitioner - Appellant: Wali Mohammed Morafa, Detainee
Petitioner - Appellee: Hadaya Morafa, As next friend of Wali Mohammed Morafa
Respondent - Appellee: Barack Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Army Brigadier General, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Hamid Razak, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5074
Petitioner - Appellant: Hamid Al Razak, Detainee
Petitioner - Appellee: Bisher Al Rawi, As next friend of Hamid Al Razak
Respondent - Appellee: Barack Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Army Brigadier General, Commander Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5012
Petitioner - Appellee: Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellee: Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Navy Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Intervenor - Appellant: Hearst Corporation, ABC, Inc., Associated Press and others
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5011
Petitioner - Appellee: Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellant: Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Navy Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Intervenor - Appellee: Hearst Corporation, ABC, Inc., Associated Press and others
Cota v. Jones & Magnus PLLC et al
as 0:2015cv02089
Plaintiff: George Frank Cota
Defendant: Jones & Magnus PLLC, Ryan B. Magnus, Mark F. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5299
Petitioner - Appellee: Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellant: Barack Obama, President of the United States, Chuck Hagel, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Richard W. Butler, Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Intervenor - Appellee: Hearst Corporation, ABC, Inc., Associated Press and others
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5276
Petitioner - Appellant: Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellee: Barack Obama, President of the United States, Chuck Hagel, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Richard W. Butler, Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Mohammed Al Adahi, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5251
Petitioner - Appellant: Mohammed Al Adahi, Detainee, Camp Delta, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and Miriam Ali Abdullah Al-Haj, next friend of Mohammed Al-Adahi
Respondent - Appellee: Barack Obama, Chuck Hagel, Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, Richard W. Butler, Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force Guantanamo, U.S. Southern Command Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5233
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adil Bin Al Wirghi, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5176
Petitioner - Appellant: Adil Bin Muhammad Al Wirghi, Detainee and Tawiss Bint Hasan Al Wirghi, as next friend of Adil bin Muhammad al Wirghi
Respondent - Appellee: Barack Obama, President of the United States, Chuck Hagel, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Richard W. Butler, Army Brigadier General, Commander, Joint Task Force and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?