Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Irwin et al v. Holt International Children's Services, Inc.
as 6:2026cv01525
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Thomas Irwin and Angela Marie Colasanti
Defendant:
Holt International Children's Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Carr v. Oregon Department of Human Services (ODHS) et al
as 1:2026cv01488
Plaintiff:
Clarence Carr
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Human Services (ODHS), Seth Lyon and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2026cv01461
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Brian Nesvik and Doug Burgum
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01438
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
