Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Michael Ciacci v. Thomas Hogan, et al
as 12-5224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael K. Ciacci
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas F. Hogan, Judge, Director Administrative Offices of the United States Courts, Michael Ryan, District of Columbia Superior Court Judge, George Lane and others
CIACCI v. HOGAN
as 1:2012cv01031
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN, MICHAEL RYAN, GEORGE LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton Taylor v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 12-5185
Petitioner - Appellant:
Milton Joseph Taylor
Respondent - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission and Simon Wainwright, Warden
STEWART v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2012cv00509
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL A. STEWART
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Saar et al
as 1:2011cv03572
Plaintiff:
John Albert Miller, IV
Defendant:
Mary Ann Saar, Gary Maynard, William Sondervan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv02124
Plaintiff:
WARDELL CROCKETT, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAY v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv02127
Petitioner:
AZIM RAY
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2011cv02049
Petitioner:
KINTA L. BROWN
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ERIC HOLDER and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MINNS v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2011mc00606
Petitioner:
ROSCOE MINNS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PATOCK v. FOX NEWS et al
as 1:2011cv01910
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. PATOCK, SR.
Defendant:
NBC TELEVISION NETWORK, NBC NEWS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
