Cases 21 - 30 of 5,467
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Rachel M Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Becerra et al v. Linobghk, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02752
Plaintiff:
Roberto Becerra and Miguel Vivar
Defendant:
Linobghk, LLC doing business as The Healthy Kitchen and Mark Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Smith v. Lyle et al
as 1:2024cv02767
Plaintiff:
Emily Smith
Defendant:
james lyle and Fulmar Advisors LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02506
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
agilon health, inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Smith v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv02465
Plaintiff:
Susie Johnson, Richard Young, Donnie Marshall and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
