Cases 21 - 30 of 99
ViralHog, LLC v. Jackson et al
as 9:2019cv00138
Defendant:
O'Shea Jackson, Sr., Derrick Montez Jones, UMG Recordings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
ViralHog, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cudd v. Kohut et al
as 6:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Paul Rees and Kristion Kohut
Plaintiff:
James Cudd, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Rees
as 6:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Richard Junious Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Paul Rees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WBI Energy Transmissions, Inc. v. Subsurface Easements for the Storage of Natural Gas in the Judith River Subterranean Geological Formation et al
as 1:2018cv00088
Defendant:
Subsurface Easements for the Storage of Natural Gas in the Judith River Subterranean Geological Formation, A & T Properties, LLC, Nicole Leigh Adamson and others
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arisebank et al
as 1:2018mc00001
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arisebank, Jared Rice, Sr and Stanley Ford
Two Two v. USA
as 1:2018cv00033
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Len Ray Two Two, sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Door v. USA
as 1:2017cv00119
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Garrett Dean Door, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bates v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Eddie R. Bates, Sr.
Defendant:
Yellowstone County Detention Facility, CHP Medical Providers and Staff, Heidi Effinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cudd v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2017cv00108
Petitioner:
James Cudd, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Montana and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goldsmith v. Batista et al
as 6:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Darren Dee Goldsmith, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Batista, Larry Pasha, Danny Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
