Cases 21 - 30 of 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Sterling Lee Ustynik v. Tractor Supply Company
as 3:2023cv05214
Plaintiff:
Sterling Lee Ustynik
Defendant:
Supply Tractor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Richard Castellanos v. Sterling Price
as 2:2023cv05801
Petitioner:
Richard Castellanos
Respondent:
Sterling Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford C. Loyer v. Stirling Price
as 2:2023cv05380
Petitioner:
Clifford C. Loyer and Clifford Chaun Loyer
Respondent:
Sterling Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abadilla v. Precigen, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv06936
Defendant:
Randal J. Kirk, Rick L. Sterling, Precigen, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Joseph Abadilla, Raju Shah, Joseph Seppen and others
Petitioner:
Kenneth R. Clayton, M.D., Chris Lorino, Michael Lorino and others
Victor Velasquez v. Sterling Price
as 5:2023cv01290
Plaintiff:
Victor Velasquez
Defendant:
Sterling Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clifford Loyer v. Sterling Price
as 2:2023cv05131
Petitioner:
Clifford C. Loyer and Clifford Chaun Loyer
Respondent:
Sterling Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
