Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Saechao v. Personify Financial
as 3:2020cv06738
Defendant:
Personify Financial
Plaintiff:
Tsee Saechao
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Saeteurn et al v. Dobson, et al.,
as 2:2020cv01754
Plaintiff:
Sandy Saeteurn, Meuy Saechao, Nai Saeteurn and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Joshua Dobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Murphy v. Covello et al
as 1:2020cv01214
Defendant:
E. Alwazani, J. Lynch, P. Covello and others
Plaintiff:
Monrell D. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saeteurn et al v. Dobson, et al.,
as 2:2020at00836
Plaintiff:
Sandy Saeteurn, Meuy Saechao, Nai Saeteurn and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Joshua Dobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ademus Saechao v. Cheryl Eplett
as 20-1356
Respondent / Appellee:
CHERYL EPLETT, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADEMUS A. SAECHAO
William Uschold, et al v. Carriage Services, Inc., et al
as 20-15523
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TON SAECHAO, TIANA NAPLES, WILLIAM USCHOLD, each individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
CARRIAGE CEMETERY SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California Corporation and CARRIAGE FUNERAL SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Aguilar et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2020cv00124
Plaintiff:
Michael Coffaro, Daniel Buck, Katherine Pearson and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01723
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Varn Saechao v. Robert Fox
as 19-16961
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT FOX
Petitioner / Appellant:
VARN SAECHAO
Saechao v. Saul
as 4:2019cv04396
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kownai Saechao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
