Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Soaring Eagle Casino and Resor v. NLRB
as 14-2405
Petitioner:
SOARING EAGLE CASINO AND RESORT, an Enterprise of the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Saginaw Chippewa v. NLRB
as 13-1629
Petitioner Cross-Respondent:
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE OF MICHIGAN
Respondent Cross-Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Saginaw Chippewa v. NLRB
as 13-1569
Petitioner:
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE OF MICHIGAN
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Hall v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hall
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan LTD Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan v. Becker et al
as 1:2011cv14652
Defendant:
Craig Becker , Mark Pearce , Brian Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
United States of America v. Compo et al
as 1:2011mc50174
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Howard Compo
Garnishee:
Petro Vest, Incorporated and Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv12801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Lujan, et al
as 1:1990cv00957
Plaintiff:
Ramah Navajo Chapter
Defendant:
Manuel Lujan , Eddie Brown , Marvin Pierce and others
Amicu:
Chugachmiut and Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.
Movant:
Klamath Tribes, Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon , Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and others
Claimant:
Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon and Navajo Agricultural Products Industry
Objector:
United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Class Counsel
Interpleader:
Alturas Indian Rancheria, Phillip Del Rosa , Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
