Cases 21 - 30 of 591
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
US Department of Labor, Secretary of v. MKK Holdings Inc et al
as 4:2024cv10677
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and US Department of Labor, Secretary of
Defendant:
MKK Holdings Inc., d/b/a Blue Fish Asian Cuisine, Sung Hee Kim, an individual, Min Kyu Kim, an individual and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US Department of Labor, Acting Secretary of v. Dada Guru, Hospitality, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv10540
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su and US Department of Labor, Acting Secretary of
Defendant:
DADA GURU, HOSPITALITY, INC., PRAKASH PATEL, Pratyush Patel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
