Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Fairchild et al v. Powell et al
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Shannon Fairchild , Levi Burden and The Intersection, LLC
Defendant:
Ralph Powell, Kedrick Wills, Russell Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
James Hogan
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Debra Field, David McClusky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutherford v. City of Pocatello et al
as 4:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
James N. Rutherford
Defendant:
City of Pocatello , Pocatello Police Department , Scott Marchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Basterrechea et al
as 1:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
Matthew Townsend
Defendant:
Tracy Basterrechea , Shannon Taylor and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reilly et al v. Levin et al
as 1:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
James P. Reilly and Victoria Jelderks
Defendant:
Matthew A. Levin , Shannon L. Armstrong , Mark A. Fleischauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hogan et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Hogan and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Kevin Kempf, Jeff Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitch v. Blades et al
as 1:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mark Fitch
Defendant:
Randy Blades, Segadelli, Stelzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Stelzer et al
as 1:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Stelzer, Segadelli, Kimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Morgan
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Brent Reinke, Kevin Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. City of Nampa et al
as 1:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Shannon Noah Martin
Defendant:
City of Nampa, Deny Burns and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
