Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Spearman v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Louis Edward Spearman
Defendant:
John H Adams, Mary Holligan, Darryl E Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv02868
Petitioner:
Louis Edward Spearman
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spearman v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
Gale Yvetta Spearman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
KHAN v. ROUNDTABLE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2010cv00386
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED KHAN
Defendant:
ROUNDTABLE CORPORATION, JOHN W. BEAKLEY, RCDQ BLOOMINGTON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Lucky B., LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01559
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Defendant:
Lucky B., LLC, Cody Henson, Billy Del Edens, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spearman v. Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00735
Petitioner:
Sedrick Dewayne Spearman
Respondent:
Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spearman v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv01432
Petitioner:
Louis Edward Spearman
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spearman v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00553
Petitioner:
Sedrick Dewayne Spearman
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Henderson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
James Charles Davis
Defendant:
Henderson County Sheriff's Department, Ira Spearman, FNU Fulmer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01945
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
