Cases 21 - 30 of 47
GANDY v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv01118
Plaintiff:
JAMI GANDY
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
KIRCHNER v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv01678
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KIRCHNER
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
AZEMAR v. THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv01486
Plaintiff:
EDWARD D. AZEMAR, JR.
Defendant:
THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ESTATE OF RICHARD G. LUTZ, JR. et al v. LUTZ et al
as 2:2016cv01461
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF RICHARD G. LUTZ, JR. and SHEREE NORDALL
Defendant:
SANDRA LUTZ, MOTORIST LIFE INSURANCE CO. , STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. MASCO CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv05640
Plaintiff:
BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MASCO CORPORATION, MASCO CONTRACTOR SERVICES CENTRAL, INC. and TOPBUILD CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. ASKO DISTRIBUTION NORTH AMERICA, LLC
as 2:2015cv02600
Plaintiff:
BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ASKO DISTRIBUTION NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOEFLER v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
SHARON HOEFLER
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
CORCORAN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00742
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. CORCORAN
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
EMMERLING v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2014cv05202
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EMMERLING
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
WRIGHT v. COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE et al
as 2:2013cv04681
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WRIGHT
Defendant:
COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE and STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
