Cases 21 - 30 of 405
Harmon v. State of Alaska
as 1:2023cv00009
Petitioner:
James D. Harmon
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Alaska v. The United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
State of Alaska
Defendant:
The United States Department of Agriculture, The United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Tom Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Robinson v. Attorney General for the State of Alaska et al
as 3:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Jayson Sterling Robinson
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alaska, Superior Court for the State of Alaska at Anchorage and Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Sherrie I. Wilson
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tholson v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Leon Tholson
Defendant:
B.A. Jones, S. Nelson and State of Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teas v. State of Alaska et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Roger Teas
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, James Milburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stansberry v. Entry State of Alaska, et al
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Entry State of Alaska
Katchatag v. State of Alaska et al
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Katchatag
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Dep't. of Corr., Laura M. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
Lovie Devon Houston
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
