Cases 21 - 30 of 2,783
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Kelly Barton Terry v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kelly Barton Terry
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Terry Fabricant et al v. Pro Source Lending Group LLC
as 2:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Terry Fabricant and Isaac Santiago
Defendant:
Pro Source Lending Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Terry Rogers v. Loandepot, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Terry Rogers and Daroya Isaiah
Defendant:
LOANDEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bravo Acevedo v. Herbst et al
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Maria Consuelo Bravo Acevedo
Defendant:
Gary Herbst, Brian Poochigian, Terry A. Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terry Dwayne Young v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Terry Dwayne Young
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
