Cases 21 - 30 of 2,581
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 0:2024cv60145
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bayne et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd. et al
as 8:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
RANDY BAYNE, John Anderson, Anne Banks and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., TAI'AN TAISHAN PLASTERBOARD CO., LTD., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Potkovic v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.
as 8:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Terry Potkovic
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BOLDRIDGE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2023cv00333
Petitioner:
TERRY L BOLDRIDGE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGUIRE-MOLLICA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Quider v. Royal Caribbean Group
as 1:2023cv24433
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Group and Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd
Plaintiff:
Terry Quider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Freeze v. Larizza et al
as 3:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Freeze
Defendant:
R.J. Larizza, Homer "Gator&quo DeLoach, III, Homer Deloach III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clarke v. Oaktree Funding Corp
as 1:2023cv24413
Plaintiff:
Terry Clarke
Defendant:
Oaktree Funding Corp
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Marshall v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2023cv24400
Plaintiff:
Terri Marshall
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
