Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Oliver Williams v. State of California, et al
as 08-16102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVER WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM CAREY and others
Kevin Williams v. John W. Haviland
as 08-15834
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN ANTONIO WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM CAREY, Warden and JOHN W. HAVILAND, Warden
Pimpton v. Carey
as 08-55172
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY RAY PIMPTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM CAREY, Warden
Fletcher v. Carey et al
as 4:2008cv00287
Petitioner:
Shawn Fletcher
Respondent:
Tom Carey and Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dominguez v. Carey et al
as 2:2007cv01954
Plaintiff:
John H. Dominguez
Defendant:
Tom Carey, R Babcock, B Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of California et al
as 2:2007cv01768
Plaintiff:
Oliver Williams
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections, Tom Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Carey et al
as 2:2007cv01617
Petitioner:
Johnnie Ray Hairston
Respondent:
Tom Carey and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. Carey et al
as 2:2007cv01582
Petitioner:
Steven Crump
Respondent:
Tom Carey and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Carey, et al
as 2:2007cv01512
Petitioner:
Willie J. Woods
Respondent:
Tom Carey and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Carey
as 3:2007cv00624
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Tom Carey, C. Brown, J. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
